(Figure 2)
While the cultural and ideological landscape of
Britain continues to evolve, Bond was first created in an older Britain, where
traditionalist ideas and gender stereotype dictated the films’ ideological
position. What can be argued as a highly masculine focussed film series, the
representation of quintessential Britain remains firmly at the heart of the
franchise, along with this unfortunate gender bias.
In contemporary society it is viewed that “gender is
not biological but it refers to a socially constructed set of behaviour patterns” (Poppa & Gavriliub, 2015, p.1200). Film theorist Laura Mulvey analyses these gender
positions, labelling ‘the male gaze’ (Hein, 2006, Laura Mulvey, Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema) as the dominant
perspective presented in mainstream media. The theory of the male gaze
describes the objectification of women, whom are frequently presented as sexual
objects. In the 007 franchise, the Bond girl is the ultimate embodiment of male
fantasy, an overtly sexualised character archetype usually young, attractive
and almost always seduced by Bond. Even their names adhere to their
objectification, such as ‘Pussy Galore’, ‘Holly Good Head’ and ‘Chew Mee’.
These examples highlight ‘scopophilia’ (McQuillan, 2000, The Narrative reader) and the voyeuristic exploitation of
women.
Comparatively, a recent study shows “a slight trend away from the limited female roles of the fifties and the attendant feminization and glamorization of females, and toward a more autonomous and active participation” (Neuendorf, Gore & Dalessandro, 2009, P. 757). The use of the adjective “slight”, indicates a minor change in how the franchise continues to promote out-dated gender representations. Stronger female characters such as M (Bond’s no nonsense boss) were originally played by men. However, since Judi Dench’s portrayal of the role the increase in positive female representations have become more evident within the series. In the earlier films the character Eve Moneypenny was presented as M’s secretary whom Bond would occasionally flirt with. In Skyfall Moneypenny works alongside Bond in the field, marking her as his equal and portraying the rise in feminist ideology.
Comparatively, a recent study shows “a slight trend away from the limited female roles of the fifties and the attendant feminization and glamorization of females, and toward a more autonomous and active participation” (Neuendorf, Gore & Dalessandro, 2009, P. 757). The use of the adjective “slight”, indicates a minor change in how the franchise continues to promote out-dated gender representations. Stronger female characters such as M (Bond’s no nonsense boss) were originally played by men. However, since Judi Dench’s portrayal of the role the increase in positive female representations have become more evident within the series. In the earlier films the character Eve Moneypenny was presented as M’s secretary whom Bond would occasionally flirt with. In Skyfall Moneypenny works alongside Bond in the field, marking her as his equal and portraying the rise in feminist ideology.
Although
negative female representations seem to have relaxed over time, the formulae
of the Bond girl remains a constant,
proving a fundamental convention to the Bond world. In particular, the routine
dramatic deaths of the protagonist’s female counterparts have become as iconic
as Bond’s Aston Martin and in turn supports ideological gender stereotypes that
position men as powerful and women as disposable. In order to cater for both
ideals; the most recent films present a female character hybrid, whereby the
bond girl is both smart and physically attractive. This, will subsequently
appeal to a modern feminist audience, while remaining loyal to the Bond girl
convention. Furthermore, the more recent Bond films address these old-fashioned
ideologies by using tongue in
cheek humour to counteract the dated representations. Women are now competitors
of Bond, rather than objects for the male gaze to indulge in.
Conversely, Louis Althusser argues repressive “ideological state apparatuses” (Althusser, 2001, P. 85) and in many ways Bond is a product that conforms to these repressive ideologies. In this case, the feminist discourse takes a back seat, where M and their like are continually over-shadowed by the glamorous Bond girl; she remains an accepted and indeed desired character archetype of the mega franchise. These conflicting ideological perspectives concerning female representation remain unbalanced. While recent renditions of the franchise present characters that challenge gender stereotype, women in Bond continue to be positioned as the protagonist’s inferior. While core Bond components remain, some neoliberalist ideas within the franchise are challenged by using pro-feminist characters that will engage contemporary audiences.
(588)
Comments
Post a Comment